Arsenteva Svetlana Ivanovna
PhD in Philosophy, associate Professor
The Federal State Educational Establishment of Higher Education “The Chuvash state university named after I. N. Ulyanov”, Cheboksary (Russia)
Ethno-cultural issues in the context of globalization
Key words: global society, socio - cultural reactions of small peoples, ethno-cultural deformations, assimilation processes, global framework of evolutionary interpretation, global ethnic frustrations.
Abstract: to analyze the main provisions of the concept of the global framework for evolutionary interpretations of the peoples beyond the original cultures which require entirely new tools development types of international reflection, the formation of a new ethno-cultural mentality, which contributed to the preservation of the basic features of ethnic identity and the simultaneous integration into universal culture.
The phenomenon of development of modern society, called "globalization", attracted the attention of researchers and scientists. Crossing borders has always been a source of innovation in human history, as no community, being isolated, could create a small share of its cultural and technical heritage. In the modern world, almost all peoples are included in the processes of intercultural contacts and experience certain ethno-cultural deformations. According to some researchers, this is due to the fact that interacting societies are usually at different levels of socio-economic development and their contacts are asymmetric: cultural borrowing and assimilation processes occur mainly in one direction - from societies more developed politically and economically, to less developed.
Each national culture has its own special code, its own ethnic picture of the world, its own images of the holistic perception of the surrounding world, characteristic only for it. Each individual culture, being a part of the world, when interacting with other cultures, depending on the specific cultural and historical situation, has a certain level of independence and originality. It is quite natural that all the spiritual and material culture created by people as a whole has a universal character. Each individual ethnic group is an integral part of humanity and at the same time is the carrier and Creator of its own mentality, customs, mores, values and traditions[1].
But no matter how significant the achievements of an individual nation, the true progress of peoples is associated with their familiarization with the world experience, with universal values, with world culture. Although in the process of assimilation and adaptation of those elements of culture that have risen to the international level, there is often a loss of certain ethnic cultures of their positive value components, and sometimes the complete disappearance of local and ethnic identity.
The modern world forces people to adapt to new cultural scales, to build a global society and find a possible niche. The bitterness of the peoples in this struggle shows that not everyone is ready for this inevitable transformation, and the socio-culture of a number of peoples will ever have to leave the world stage in the process of globalization.
In turn, the new global framework of evolutionary interpretation takes peoples beyond these distinctive cultures and requires completely new means of mastering the types of international reflection, the formation of a new ethno-cultural mentality that would contribute to the preservation of the main features of ethnic identity and their simultaneous integration into universal culture. Of course, this would contribute to the preservation of the ethno-cultural and genetic Fund of the nation in the social nature[1].
Against the background of these processes, the value of the very individuality of the human person decreases. At the same time, new socio-cultural reactions of small peoples to global ethnic frustrations force to reconsider the policy of global integration in favor of small cultures and social communities, since the political practice of the last decades has shown the impotence of large communities in the implementation of the ideas of globalism in front of small social organisms[2]. People understand that the idea of globalism, as a strategy for the development of the world community, serves primarily to protect the interests of large communities, and therefore in this socio-political interaction there is no free tactical field for small or medium-sized nation States. Naturally, this circumstance forces people to fight for their living space by all economic, military-political and socio-cultural means.
Список использованной литературы:
1. Арсентьева С.И. Этнокультурные процессы в условиях глобализации. В сборнике: Актуальные проблемы становления и развития этнофилософии материалы Международной научно-практической конференции. 2015. С. 132-135.
2. Арсентьева С.И. Специфика Адекватности перцептивных образов NovaInfo.Ru. 2017. Т. 6. № 58. С. 312-315.
3. Александров В.Б. Общечеловеческие ценности: диалог культур. – Тверь, 1992. С.17-26.
4. Библер В.С. От наукоучения к логике культуры: два философских введения в ХХI век. – М., 1990. С.292.
5. Баглиева А.З. Глобализационный процесс: управление, подходы, проблемы.// Ученые записки Российского государственного социального университета. - М., 2007. С.95-98.
6. Ломтева Т.Н. Базовые концепции межкультурной коммуникации. - Ставрополь. 1999.
7. Соловьев Вл. Русская идея // Русская идея. - М., 1995. С. 187.