Таксономические критерии:
(1) Основывается на теории, охватывает широкую область.
(2) Теория сформулирована так, чтобы давать проверяемые выводы.
(3) Теория имеет дело с описанием и взаимодействием качеств.
(4) Модель имеет иерархическую форму.
(5) Результаты психометрических проверок должны быть воспроизводимы.
(6) Факторы первого и второго порядка должны ясно различаться.
(7) Мета- анализ результатов показывает схождение к определенной модели.
(8) Результаты исследований с использованием большого количества шкал должны показывать схождение к определенной модели.
Причинные критерии:
(9) Ясное понимание генетической архитектуры модели.
(10)Биологическая основа модели должна иметь теоретическое обоснование и быть проверяемой.
(11) Модель не должна зависеть от культуры.
(12) Должно быть постоянство во времени.
(13) Модель должна порождать социально значимые выводы.
(14) Модель должна отводить определенную роль "нормальной науке."
ЛИТЕРАТУРА
Abdle-Khalek A., Ibrahim A. & Budek M. (1986). The factoral structure of the 16PF and the EPQ in Egyptian samples: A preliminary study. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 65-72.
Angleitner A. (1990). Personality Psychology: Trends and developments. Paper read at the 5-th Congress of European Personality Psychology, Ariccia, 11-16 June.
Barnes B. (1982). T.S. Kuhn and Social Science. London: Macmillian.
Barrett P.& Eysenck S.B.G. (1984). The assessment of personality factors across 25 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 615-632.
Barrett P. & Kline P. (1982a). The itemic properties of the Eysenck Personality Questionaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 73-80.
Barrett P. & Kline P. An item and radial parcel factor analysis of the 16PF questionaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 259-270.
Bartussek D. (1974). Note on the reliability and factorial validity of the German 16PF questionaire. Diagnostic, 20, 49-55.
Becker W.C. (1961). A comparison of the factor structure and other properties of the 16PF and the Guilford-Martin personality inventories. Educational Psychological Measurment, 21, 353-404.
Borkenau P. & Ostendorf F. (1989). Untersuchungen zum Funf-Faktoren-Modell der Personlichkeit und reiner diagnostichen Erfassung. Zeitschrift fur Differentielle und Diagnostiche Psychologie, 10, 239-251.
Borkenau P. & Ostendorf F. Comparing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: A study on the 5-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 515-524.
Boyle G.J. (1986). Intermodelity superfactors in the 16PF,Eight State battery and Objective Motivation Analysis Test. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 583-586.
Brand C.R. & Egan V. (1987). The "Big Five" dimensions of personality? Evidence from ipsative, adjectival self-attributions. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1165-1171.
Browne J.A. & Howarth E. (1977). A comprehensive factor analysis of personality questinaier items: A test of twenty putative factor hypotheses. Multivar. Behavioral Research, 12, 399-427.
Buss A.H. (1989). Personality as traits. American Psychologist, 44, 1378-1388.
Buss D.M. & Craik K.H. (1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90, 105-126.
Cattell R.B. (1943).The discription of personality. II. Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476-507.
Cattell R.B. (1973). Personality and mood by questionaire. London: Jossey-Bass.
Cattell R.B. & Scheier I.H. (1961). The meaning and measurment of neuroticism and anxiety. New York: Ronald.
Cattell R.B., Eber H.W. & Tatsuoka M. (1970). Handbook for Sixteen Personality Factor Questionaire. Campagne, Ill.: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
Cloniger, C.R. (1986). A unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxious states. Psychiatric Developments, 3, 167-226
Comrey A.L. (1980). Handbook of interpretation for the Comrey Personality Scale. San Diego: EDITS
Conley J.J. (1984a). The hierachy of consistency: A review and model of longitudianal findings on adult individual differences in intellegence, personality and self-opinion. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 11-26.
Conley J.J. (1984b). Longitudianal consistency of adult personality: Self-reported psychological characteristics across 45-years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1325-1334.
Corulla W.J. (1987). A psychometric investigation of the Eysenck Personality Questionaire (Revised) and its relationship to the I7 impulsiveness questionaire. Personality and Individual Differences,8,651-658.
Costa P.T. & McCrae R.R. (1988). From catalogue to classification:Murray's needs and the five factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,55, 258-265.
Cronbach L.J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychology,12, 671-684.
Digman J.M. (1989). Five robust trail dimensions: Development, stability, and utility. Journal of Personality,57,195-214.
Digman J.M. & Inouye Z.(1986). Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 116-123.
Digman J.M. & Takemoto-Chock N.K. (1981). Factors in the natural language of personality: Re-analysis, comparison and integration of of six major studies. Multivariate Behaviour Research.16,149-170.
Eaves L., Eysenck H.J. & Martin N. (1988). Genes, culture and personality: an empirical approach. New York: Academic Press.
Eibl-Eibesfeldt I. (1986). Die Biologie des menschlichen Verhaltens. Zurich: Piper.
Eysenck H.J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Eysenck H.J. (1950). Criterion analysis: An application of hypothetico-deductive method to factor analysis. Psychological Review, 57, 38-53.
Eysenck H.J. (1967). The biological basis of personality Spriengfield: Thomas.
Eysenck H.J. (1970a). The structure of human personality. (3rd Edn) London: Methuen.
Eysenck H.J. (1970b). A dimensional system of psychodiagnosis. In A.Mahrer,A.R.(Ed.), New Approaches to personality classification (pp.169-210). New York: Columbia University Press.
Eysenck H.J. (1972). Primaries or second order factors: A critical consideration of Cattel's 16 PF battery. British Journal of Social Clinical Psychology, 11, 265-269.
Eysenck H.J. (Ed.) (1973). Handbook of abnormal psychology. London: Pitman.
Eysenck H.J. (1976). Sex and personality. London: Open Books.
Eysenck H.J. (1978a). The development of personality and its relation to learning. In: Murrey,G. (Ed.) Melbourne studies in education (pp. 134-187). Melbourne: University Press.
Eysenck, H.J. (1978b). Superfactors P,E and N in a comprehensive factor space. Multivariate Behaviour Research, 13, 475-482.
Eysenck H.J. (1980a). The bio-social nature of man. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 1, 125-134.
Eysenck H.J. (1980b). The bio-social model of man and the unification of psychology. In: Chapman A.J. & James P.M. (Eds). Models of Man. London: British Psychological Society.
Eysenck H.J.(Ed.)(1981). A model of personality. New York: Springer.
Eysenck H.J. (1983a). Is there a paradigm in personality research? Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 369-397.
Eysenck H.J. (1983b). Cicero and the state-trait theory of anxiety: Another case of delayed recognition. American Psychologists, 38,114-115.
Eysenck H.J. (1984). The place of individual differences in a scientific psychology. In: Royce J.R. & Mos L.P. (Eds). Annals of theoretical psychology (vol. 1, pp. 233-285). New York: Plenum Press.
Eysenck,H.J. (1985a) Decline and fall of Freudian empire. London: Viking.
Eysenck,H.J. (1985b) The place of theory in a world of facts. In Madsen,K.B. & Mos, L.P.(Eds), Annals of theoretical psychology, pp(17-72). NewYork: Plenum Press.
Eysenck,H.J. (1990a). Biological dimensions of personality. In Pervin,L.A. (Ed.), Handbook of personality: theory and research. New York: Guilford.
Eysenck,H.J. (1990b). Genetic and environment contrbutions to individual differences: the three major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality, 98, 245-261.
Eysenck,H.J. & Eysenck,M.W. (1985). Personality and individual differences. New York: Plenum Press.
Eysenck,H.J. & Eysenck,S.B.G. (1969) Personality structure and measurement. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Eysenck H.J. & Eysenck S.B.G. (1976). Psychotism as a dimension of personality. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Eysenck,H.J. & Eysenck,S.B.G. (1983). Recent advances in the cross-cultural studies of personality. In: Butcher.J.N. and Spilberger,L.D. (Eds), Advances in personality assessment (pp. 41-69). Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.
Eysenck,H.J. & Gudjonsson,G. (1990) The causes and cures of criminality. New York: Plenum Press.
Eysenck,H.J. & Wilson,G. (1973). The experimental study of Frudian theories. London: Methuen.
Eysenck H.J., White O., Soueif M.I. (1969). Factors in the Cattel Personality Inventory. In: Eysenck,H.J. & Eysenck, S.B.G. (Eds). Personality structure and measurement, (pp.218-228). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Eysenck H.J., Nias D. & Cox D. (1982). Sport and personality. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 4, 1-56.
Eysenck,H.J., Barrett,P. & Eysenck,S.B.G. (1985). Indices of factor comparison for homologous and non-homologous personality scales in 24 different countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 503-504.
Eysenck,M.W. & Eysenck,H.J. (1980). Mishel and the concept of personality. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 191-209.
Eysenck,S.B.G. & Eysenck,H.J. (1977). The place of impulsiveness in a dimensional system of personality description. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 57-68.
Eysenck,S.B.G. & Eysenck,H.J. (1978). Impulsiveness and venturesomeness: Their position in a dimensional system of personality description. Psychological Reports, 43, 1247-1255.
Eysenck,S.B.G., Eysenck,H.J. & Barrett,P. (1985). A revised Psychotism scale. Personality and Individual Differences,6,21-29.
Eysenck,S.B.G., Humphrey,N. & Eysenck,H.J. (1980) The structure of personality in Australians as compared with English subjects. Journal of Social Psychology,112,167-173.
Fiske,D.W. (1949) Consistiency of the factorial structure of personality rating from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology.44, 329-344.
Fitch.W.M. & Margoliash,E. (1967). Construction of philogenetic trees. Science, 155, 279-284.
Friedman,A., Webb,J. & Lewark,R. (1989) Psychological testing with the MMPI. London: Erlbaum.
Gale,A. & Edwards, J.A. (1983). Physiological correlates of human behaviour: Individual differences and psychopathology. London: Academic Press.
Gentry, T.A., Wakefild,J.A. & Friedman, A.F. (1985). MMPI scales for measuring Eysenck's factors. Journal of Personality Research, 49, 146-149.
Gholson,B., Shadish,W., Neiumeyer,R. & Houts,A. (1989). Psychology of science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Goh.D.S.,King,D.W. & King,L.A. (1982). Psychometric evaluation of the Eysenk Personality Questionnaire. Education and Psychological Measurement. 42, 297-309.
Goldberg,L.R. (1981). Language and individual differences: the search for universals in personality lexicons. In: Wheeler, L. (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol.2,pp.141-165). Beverely Hills, Calif.: Sage.
Goldberg,L.R. (1982). From ace to zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In: Spielberger,C.D. and Butcher,J.N. (Eds), Advances in personality assessment (pp.203-234). Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.
Goldberg,L.R. (1986). The validity of rating procedures to index the hierarhical level of categories. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 323-347.
Gough,H.G. (1957). Manual for the California psychological inventory. Palo Alto, Calif.: Counselling Psychological Press.
Gough,H.G. & Heilbrun,A.B. (1965). The adjective check list manual. Palo Alto, Calif.: Counsulting Psychological Press.
Grayson,D.A. (1986). Latent traits analysis of the Eysenk Personality Questionaire. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 20, 217-235.
Green,D.G. & Walkey,F.H. (1980). A non-metric analysis of Eysenk's Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behaviour Research,15, 157-163.
Grief,G. (1970). Untersuchungen zur deutschen Ubersetzung des 16PF Fragebodens. Psychologische Beitrage, 12, 186-213.
Gruenbaum,A. (1984).The foundations of psychoanalysis. London: University of California Press.
Hall,C.S. & Lindzey,G. (1985). Introduction to theories of personality. New York: Wiley.
Hammond,S.M. (1987). The item structure of the Eusenck Personality Questionnaire across method and culture. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 541-549.
Helmes,E. (1980). A psychometric investigation of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 43-45.
Howarth,E. (1972). A psychometric investigation of Eysenck's Personality Inventory. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11, 162-174.
Howarth,E. (1976a). Were Cattel's "personality sphere" factors correctly identified in the first instance? British Journal of Psychology, 67, 213-230.
Howarth,E. (1976b). A psychometric investigation of Eysenck's Personality Inventory. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 11, 162-174.
Howarth,E. & Browne,J. (1971) An item-factor-analysis of the 16 PF. Personality, 2, 117-139.
Howarth,E. & Browne,J.A. (1972). An item-factor-analysis of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 11, 162-174.
Howarth,E., Browne,J.A. & Marceau,R. (1971). An item analysis of Cattel's 16PF. Canadian Journal of Behaviour Science, Review, 4, 13-18.
John,O.P. (1990). The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In: Pervin,L.(Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research (pp.66-100). NY Guilford.
Kline,P. & Barrett,P. (1983). The factors in personality questionnaires among normal subjects. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy. 5, 141-202.
Krige,J.(1980).Science, revolution and discontinuity. Sussex: Harvester Press.
Krug,S.E. (1981).Interpreting 16PF profile patterns. Champagne, Ill: IPAT.
Krug,S.E. & Cattell,R. (1986). The number of factors in the 16PF. Psychological: A review of the evidence with specifical emphasis on methodological problems. Educational Psychological Measurement,46,509-522.
Krug,S.E. & Johns,E.F. (1986). A large-scale cross-validation of second-order personality structure defined by 16PF. Psychological Reports, 59, 683-693.
Kuhn,T.S. (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn,T.S. (1974). Second Thoughts paradigms. In: Suppe,F. (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (pp. 459-482). London: University of Illinois Press.
Lakatos,I. & Musgrave,A. (Eds) (1970). Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levonian,E. (1961a). A ststistical analysis of the 16PF Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement,21,584-596.
Levonian,E. (1961b). Personality measurement with items selected from the 16 PF Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement,21,937-946.
Lingoes,J.C. (1973). The Guttman-Lingues non-metrical program series.Ann Arbor: Mathesis Press.
Livneh,H. & Livneh,C. (1989). The five-factor model of personality: is evidence of its cross-measure validity premature? Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 75 -80.
Lor,R. (1979). A psychometric investigation of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43,54-58.
Lumsden,C.J. & WILson,E.O. (1981). Genes, mind, and culture. Harvard University Press.
McCormic,I., Green,D.E. & Walkey,F.H. (1987). A multiple replication of the three factor solution of the Eysenck Personality Inventory identified using a two-step confirmation and the factor replication procedure, FACTOREP. Personality and Individual Differences,8,285- 287.
McCrae,R.R. & Costa,P.T. (1985). Comparison of EPI and psychotism scales with measures of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 587-597.
McCrae,R.R. & Costa,P.T. (1987) Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
McCrae,R.R. & Costa,P.T. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins circumpflex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychiology, 56, 586-595.
McKenzie,J. (1988a). An item-factor analysis of the Eysenck Personality Quesstionnaire (E.P.Q.): Will the real personality factors stand up? Personality and Individual Differences,9,801-810.
McKenzie,J. (1988b).Three superfactors in the 16Pf and their relation to Eysenck's P,E,N. Personality and Individual Differences,9,843-850.
Mangan,G. (1982). The biology of human conduct. London: Pergamon Press
Martorell,C., Petro,R., Dacer,M.D. Navarro,A. & Silva,F. (1990). Assessing behavioral problems and assets in children and adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences,11,1221-1226.
Masterman,M. (1970). The nature of the paradigm. In: Lakatos,I. and Musgrave,A. (Eds), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Matthews,G. (1989). The factor structure of the 16PF: Twelve ptrimary and three secondary factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 10,931-940.
Michaelis,W. & Eysenck,H.J. (1971). The determination of personality inventory factor patterns and intercorrelations by changes in real-life motivation. Journal of Genetic Psychology,118,223-234.
Mischel,W. (1968). Personality and assessement. New York: Wiley.
Norman,W.T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66,574-583.
Norman,W.T. (1967).2800 personality trait descriptors: Normality operating characteristics for a university population. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Dept. Psychol., Univ. Michigan.
O'Gorman,J.G. & Hattie,J.A. (1986). Confirmation of the factor structure of the E.P.Q. using an Australian sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 7,894-898.
Ostendorf,F. (1990). Sprache und Personlichkeitsstructur. Regensburg: Roderer.
Oswald,W.T. & Velicer,W.F. (1980). Item format and the structure of the Eysenck Personality Inventory: A repliction. Journal of Presonality Assessement, 44, 283-288.
Peterson,D.R. (1966).The age generality of personality factors derived from raitings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20,461-474.
Popper,K. (1935). Logik der Forshung. Wien: Springer.
Reynolds,C.N. & Nichols,R.C. (1977). Factor rates for the CPI: do they capture valid variance? Educational and Psychological Measurement 37, 907-915.
Rican,P., Heinzl,Z. & Janouskova,N. (1970).Dimensionality of Cattell's Personality Questionnaire. Caskoslovenska Psychologica, 14, 332-341.
Root-Bernstein,R.S. (1989).Discovering. Cambridge: Harward University Press.
Royce,J.R.&Powell,A. (1983). Theory of personality and individual differences: Factors systems and processes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Rushton,J.P.,Brainerd,C.J. & Pressley, M. (1983). Behavioral development and construct validity: the principle of aggrergation.Psychological Bulletin, 94,18-38.
Saville,P. & Blinkhorn,S. (1976). Undergraduate personality by factored scores.Winsdor: NFER.
Saville,P. & Blinkhorn,S. (1981). Reliability, homogenity and the contrast validity of Cattell's 16 PF. Personality and Individual Differences, 2,325-323.
Schverger,J.M. & Allen,L.C. (1986).Second-order factor structure common to five personality questionnaires. Psychological Reports,58, 119-126.
Sells, S.B.,Demares,R.G. & Will,D.P. (1970). Dimensions of personality:1 Congruent factor structure of Guilford and Cattell trait markers. Multivariate Behaviour Research, 5,391-422.
Shaw,L. & Sichel,H. (1971). Accident proneness. London:Pergamon Press.
Sneath,P. (1964). Computers in bacterial classification. Advancement in Science,16,572-582.
Sokal,R. & Sneath,P. (1963). Principles of numerical taxonomy. London: Freeman.
Stelmack,R.G.(1990). Biological bases of extraversion: Psychological evidence.Journal of Personality, 58, 293-311.
Strelau,J. & Eysenck,H.J. (Eds)(1987). Personality dimensions and arousal. New York:Plenum Press.
Suppe,F. (1974). Exemplars, theories and disciplinary matrices. In: Suppe,F.(Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (pp.483-499). London: University of Illinois Press.
Thayer,R.E. (1989). The byopsychology of mood and arousal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thurstone,L.L. (1934). The vectors of mind. Psychological Review, 41,1-32.
Timm,V. (1968). Reabilitat und Faktorenstructur von Cattell's 16 PF Test bei einer Deutscher Stichprobe. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Psychologie, 15, 354-373.
Tupes,E.C. & Christal,R.E. (1958). Stability of personality trait rating factors obtained under diverse conditions. USAFWADC Technical Note, No.58-61.
Tupes,E.C. & Christal,R.E. (1961). Reccurent personality factors based on trait ratings.USAFASD Technical Report, No.61- 90.
Vernon,P.E.(1938).The assessemnet of psychological qualities by verbal methods.London: HMSO.
Wakefild,J.A. (1979).Using personality to individualize instruction. San Diego: EDITS.
Walkey,F.H. & Green, (1981). The structure of Eysenck Personality Inventory: a comparison between simple and more complex of a multiple scale questionnaire, Multivariate Behaviour Research,16,361-372.
Walkey,F.H. & Green,D.E. (1990) The factor structure of the Eysenck Personality Inventory revealed in the responses of Australian and New Zealalnd subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 571-576.
Walkey,F.H.,Green,D.E. & MacCormick,I. (1986). The three-factor structure of the Eysenck Personality Inventory revealed by a two-step confirmatory procedure. Personality and Individual Differences,7,903-905.
Walkey,F.H., Stumpf,H. & Green,D.E. (1988). A comparative evaluation of the factor structure of a German language version of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 771-775.
Wiggins,J.S. & Trapnell,P.D. (1990). Personality structure: The return of "Big Five". In: Briggs,S.R., Hogen,R. and Jones, W.H. (Eds), Handbook of personality psychology. Orlando, Fla: Academic Press.
Williams,R.J. (1956). Biochemical individuality. London: Chapman & Hall.
Wilson,G.D. (1981). Personality and social behaviour. In: Eysenck, H.J. (Ed.), <+>A model for personality (pp.210-245). New York: Springer.
Zuckerman,M. (1979). Sensation seeking: beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.
Zuckerman,M. (Ed.) (1983). Biological bases of sensation seeking, impulsivity and anxiety. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.
Zuckerman,M., Kuhlman,M. & Camac,C. (1988). What lies beyond E and N? Factor analyses of scales believed to measure basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 96-107.
Zwang,G. (1985). La statue de Freud. Paris: Lafout.
Перевод Н.Алмаева