Your Apps Know Where You Were Last Night,
The millions of dots on the map trace highways *, side streets and bike trails — each one following the path of an anonymous [ə'nɔnɪməs] cellphone user.
One path tracks (= follows) someone from a home outside Newark to a nearby Planned Parenthood, remaining there for more than an hour. Another represents a person who travels with the mayor of New York during the day and returns to Long Island at night.
Yet another leaves a house in upstate New York at 7 a.m. and travels to a middle school 14 miles away, staying until [ʌn'tɪl] late afternoon each school day. Only one person makes that trip: Lisa Magrin, a 46-year-old math teacher. Her smartphone goes with her.
An app on the device gathered (= collected) her location information, which was then sold without her knowledge. It recorded her whereabouts [ˌweərə'bauts] (= location) as often as every two seconds, according to a database of more than a million phones in the New York area that was reviewed by The New York Times. While Ms. Magrin’s identity was not disclosed in those records, The Times was able to easily connect her to that dot.
The app tracked her as she went to a Weight Watchers meeting and to her dermatologist’s office for a minor procedure [prə'siːʤə]. It followed her hiking with her dog and staying at her ex-boyfriend’s home, information she found disturbing (= making you scared and uncomfortable).
“It’s the thought of people finding out those intimate (= private) details that you don’t want people to know,” said Ms. Magrin, who allowed [ə'laud] The Times to review her location data.
Like many consumers, Ms. Magrin knew that apps could track people’s movements. But as smartphones have become ubiquitous [juː'bɪkwɪtəs]* and technology more accurate ['ækjərət], an industry of snooping (= spying) on people’s daily habits has spread and grown more intrusive*.
At least 75 companies receive anonymous, precise (= accurate) location data from apps whose users enable location services to get local news and weather or other information, The Times found. Several of those businesses claim to track up to 200 million mobile devices in the United States — about half those in use last year. The database reviewed by The Times — a sample of information gathered in 2017 and held by one company — reveals people’s travels in startling detail, accurate to within a few yards and in some cases updated more than 14,000 times a day.
These companies sell, use or analyze the data to cater to advertisers ['ædvətaɪzəz], retail outlets and even hedge funds seeking insights into consumer behavior. It’s a hot market, with sales of location-targeted advertising reaching an estimated $21 billion this year. IBM has gotten into the industry ['ɪndəstrɪ], with its purchase ['pɜːʧəs] of the Weather Channel’s apps. The social network Foursquare remade itself as a location marketing company ['kʌmpənɪ]. Prominent investors in location start-ups include Goldman Sachs and Peter Thiel, the PayPal co-founder.
Businesses say their interest is in the patterns*, not the identities, that the data reveals about consumers. They note that the information apps collect is tied not to someone’s name or phone number but to a unique ID. But those with access to the raw data* — including employees or clients — could still identify [aɪ'dentɪfaɪ] a person without consent (= without asking him). They could follow someone they knew, by pinpointing a phone that regularly ['regjələlɪ] spent time at that person’s home address. Or, working in reverse, they could attach a name to an anonymous dot, by seeing where the device spent nights and using public records to figure out (= to understand) who lived there.
Many location companies say that when phone users enable location services, their data is fair game. But, The Times found, the explanations people see when prompted to give permission are often incomplete or misleading. An app may tell users that granting access ['ækses] to their location will help them get traffic information, but not mention that the data will be shared and sold. That disclosure* is often buried in a vague [veɪg] (= unclear) privacy policy.
“Location information can reveal some of the most intimate details of a person’s life — whether you’ve visited a psychiatrist, whether you went to an A.A. meeting, who you might date,” said Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, who has proposed bills to limit the collection and sale of such data, which are largely unregulated in the United States.
“It’s not right to have consumers kept in the dark about how their data is sold and shared and then leave them unable to do anything about it,” he added.