The Myth of Generation N

For decades, social scientists and technologists have alternatively predicted the appearance of 'computer kids' or a 'net generation' - children, teenagers, and young adults who have been immersed in digital technology and the digital way of thinking since birth. This new generation, the thinking goes, will be everything that their parents weren't when it comes to technology.

(1) They will be so adept at using computers that calling them 'computer literate' would be an insult. Certainly, a lot of evidence supports a 'net generation' effect. Although there are no reliable statistics on computer literacy, good figures do exist on internet usage. According to a recent survey, 74 per cent of people in the United States aged 18 to 29 have internet access, compared with 52 per cent of those aged 50 to 64.

(2) And in my own age group, 30 to 49, 52 per cent have some kind of net access. These figures certainly argue for the existence of a 'Generation N'. But the more time I spend with the kids, who should be members of Generation N, the more convinced I am that the idea of universal computer competence among young people is a myth.

(3) I've seen 40- and 50-somethings who burn their own CDs and have phenomenal command of applications like Word, PowerPoint and Excel. Like Generation N, they've wanted to get something done and invested the time to do it. The difference between these people and today's teens is that, for many teens today, learning to use a computer is no longer optional.

(4) Typing itself is taught in the middle school (where they call it 'keyboarding'); students who went to a less technological school system and transferred are expected to pick up the skill on their own. Not a problem! 'We all figured out how to download music,' says a friend of mine who recently graduated from Stanford University. Everybody her age knows how to use a computer, she says, just like 'everybody knows how to change the oil on their car.'

Experts in human-computer interaction say that the real difference between teenagers and their elders is teens' willingness to experiment with computers. In other words, teens aren't worried about breaking their computers.

(5) These strategies, once learned, are incredibly effective for working with today's computer technology. But the point that seems to have escaped my friend is that everybody doesn't know how to change the oil on their car.

(6) But when you are surrounded by people who all share the same technological skills, it's easy to forget that there are others who don't. Unfortunately, with the changes overtaking our society, today's kids who don't have tech experience and tech aptitude are going to be left behind much faster than their elders. And that's the danger in believing that time will give us a population that's completely computer literate. Certainly, more kids today are growing up wired - but millions of them are not.

(7) For example, people who don't want to (or can't) buy their airplane tickets on the net now typically have to go through a travel agent and pay a fee. When I needed to renew my passport, the local post office didn't have the form: they told me to download it from the internet.

This is a problem that won't be solved through more education or government grants. As a society, we need to come to terms with the fact that a lot of people, young and old alike, will never go online. We need to figure out how we will avoid making life unbearable for them.

A. Look at gaps 1 – 7 in the article. For each gap, decide what is being talked about at that point in the article. The words and sentences before and after each gap will help you.

B. Seven sentences have been removed from the article. Choose from the sentences A - H the one which fits each gap (1-7). There is one extra sentence which you do not need to use.